nanog mailing list archives
Re: What could have been done differently?
From: David Lesher <wb8foz () nrk com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 23:18:25 -0500 (EST)
Somewhere in the equation, the sysadmin/enduser, whether Unix or Windows, has to take some responsibility.
Hence I loved this: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/28/technology/28SOFT.html Worm Hits Microsoft, Which Ignored Own Advice By JOHN SCHWARTZ Among the companies that found its computer system under attack by a rogue program was Microsoft, which has been preaching the gospel of secure computing. ..... -- A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz () nrk com & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
Current thread:
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security?, (continued)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? E.B. Dreger (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Florian Weimer (Jan 29)
- Mono Culture - was Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Joseph T. Klein (Jan 29)
- Re: Mono Culture - was Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Peter Salus (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Leo Bicknell (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Daniel Karrenberg (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? E.B. Dreger (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Vadim Antonov (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Jan 29)