nanog mailing list archives
Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security?
From: Florian Weimer <Weimer () CERT Uni-Stuttgart DE>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 23:14:23 +0100
Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net> writes:
(pointers ARE your friend god damnit :P)
Most C programmers have no clue about the C pointer semantics, I'm afraid, so this powerful feature is often abused. -- Florian Weimer Weimer () CERT Uni-Stuttgart DE University of Stuttgart http://CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE/people/fw/ RUS-CERT fax +49-711-685-5898
Current thread:
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security?, (continued)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Florian Weimer (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Alif The Terrible (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Mathew Lodge (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? E.B. Dreger (Jan 29)
- Message not available
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Mathew Lodge (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? E.B. Dreger (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? E.B. Dreger (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Richard A Steenbergen (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? E.B. Dreger (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Florian Weimer (Jan 29)
- Mono Culture - was Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Joseph T. Klein (Jan 29)
- Re: Mono Culture - was Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Peter Salus (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Leo Bicknell (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Daniel Karrenberg (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? E.B. Dreger (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Vadim Antonov (Jan 29)
- Re: Bell Labs or Microsoft security? Rubens Kuhl Jr. (Jan 29)