nanog mailing list archives
Re: mfnx
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 21:08:51 -0500
In a message written on Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:02:24AM -0800, Scott Granados wrote:
Nope, nobody responded from noc () above net so I tried here, got a response and was all set. Helpful once you get around the noc where we had no response.
This is not in response to Scott's specific problem, but since MFN was brought up I will inform a bit about how we work. noc@ opens a ticket. You should get an auto reply within a couple of minutes. No auto-reply probably means things are broken enough that the phone is necessary. The phone number in the above.net, mfnx.net, and AS 6461 records will (after a bit of IVR) get you to someone who can help. peering@ also opens a ticket. The same applies. Note, for us noc@ and peering@ go two different places. noc@ is realtime issues, peering@ is policy/requests and other non-realtime issues. -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/ Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request () tmbg org, www.tmbg.org
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- mfnx scott (Feb 18)
- Re: Genuity/L3 "Motion Granted"? Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 19)
- Re: Genuity/L3 "Motion Granted"? Martin Hannigan (Feb 19)
- Re: Genuity/L3 "Motion Granted"? chuck goolsbee (Feb 19)
- Re: Genuity/L3 "Motion Granted"? Ken Leland (Feb 19)