nanog mailing list archives
Re: Genuity/L3 "Motion Granted"?
From: Ken Leland <kwl () shell monmouth com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 13:39:47 -0500
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:20:31AM -0800, chuck goolsbee wrote:
provided of course *you* can actually deliver me a DS3 in a week or so if I sign papers between now and Friday!
Encourage them why don't you. Seriously though, might you not consider a second path to the sea. We've been doing that for many years, and lately it has been especially reassuring to have bankrupt-big-guy diversity. My current provisioning rule is to have no more than 2 out of 3 upstreams in bankruptcy at any one time. Of course, we allow the 3rd to be near bankruptcy, with an occaisional liquidity crisis. Ken Leland Monmouth Internet Monmouth Telephone & Telegraph
Current thread:
- Re: mfnx, (continued)
- Re: Genuity/L3 "Motion Granted"? Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 19)
- Re: Genuity/L3 "Motion Granted"? Martin Hannigan (Feb 19)
- Re: Genuity/L3 "Motion Granted"? chuck goolsbee (Feb 19)
- Re: Genuity/L3 "Motion Granted"? Ken Leland (Feb 19)