nanog mailing list archives
RE: VoIP QOS best practices
From: "Ray Burkholder" <ray () oneunified net>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:30:43 -0500
QoS isn't necessarily about throwing packets away. It is more like making voice packets 'go to the head of the line'. Of course, if you have saturation, some packets will get dropped, but at least the voice packets won't get dropped since they were prioritized higher. Ray Burkholder
-----Original Message----- From: Bill Woodcock [mailto:woody () pch net] Sent: February 10, 2003 14:05 To: Charles Youse Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: RE: VoIP QOS best practices > That doesn't seem to make a lot of sense - is it that QoS doesn't work as advertised? That's generally true as well. But why would you need it? What's the advantage to be gained in using QoS to throw away packets, when the packets don't need to be thrown away? > As someone who is looking to deploy VoIP in the near future this is of particular interest. Go ahead and deploy it. It's easy and works well. It certainly doesn't need anything like QoS to make it work. -Bill
Current thread:
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices, (continued)
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices Petri Helenius (Feb 10)
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices Jack Bates (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Charles Youse (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Bill Woodcock (Feb 10)
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices Aditya (Feb 10)
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices Charles Sprickman (Feb 11)
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices John Todd (Feb 11)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Bill Woodcock (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Bill Woodcock (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Bill Woodcock (Feb 10)
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices Steve Feldman (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Alec H. Peterson (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Bill Woodcock (Feb 10)