nanog mailing list archives
RE: VoIP QOS best practices
From: "Charles Youse" <cyouse () register com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:21:53 -0500
But I could conceivably have 10+ voice channels over a T-1, I still don't quite understand how, without prioritizing voice traffic, the quality won't degrade... C. -----Original Message----- From: Bill Woodcock [mailto:woody () pch net] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 1:20 PM To: Charles Youse Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: RE: VoIP QOS best practices > My main concern is that some of the sites that will be tied with > VoIP have only T-1 data connectivity, and I don't want a surge in > traffic to degrade the voice quality, or cause disconnections or > what-have-you. People are more accustomed to data networks going > down; voice networks going down will make people shout. It works fine on 64k connections, okay on many 9600bps connections. T1 is way more than is necessary. -Bill
Current thread:
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices, (continued)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Bill Woodcock (Feb 10)
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Charles Youse (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Bill Woodcock (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Alec H. Peterson (Feb 10)
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices Jared Mauch (Feb 10)
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices Bill Woodcock (Feb 10)
- Re[2]: VoIP QOS best practices John L Crain (Feb 10)
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices Petri Helenius (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Bill Woodcock (Feb 10)
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices Jack Bates (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Charles Youse (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Bill Woodcock (Feb 10)
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices Aditya (Feb 10)
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices Charles Sprickman (Feb 11)
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices John Todd (Feb 11)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Bill Woodcock (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Bill Woodcock (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Bill Woodcock (Feb 10)
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices Steve Feldman (Feb 10)