nanog mailing list archives
RE: VoIP QOS best practices
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 10:27:39 -0800 (PST)
> But I could conceivably have 10+ voice channels over a T-1, I still > don't quite understand how, without prioritizing voice traffic, the > quality won't degrade... Well, of course it all depends how much other traffic you're trying to get through simultaneously. Your T1 will carry ~170 simultaneous voice streams with no conflict, but you have to realize that they'll stomp on your simultaneous TCP data traffic. But you don't need to protect the _voice_... Look, just do it, and you'll see that there aren't any problems in this area. -Bill
Current thread:
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices, (continued)
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Charles Youse (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Bill Woodcock (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Alec H. Peterson (Feb 10)
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices Jared Mauch (Feb 10)
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices Bill Woodcock (Feb 10)
- Re[2]: VoIP QOS best practices John L Crain (Feb 10)
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices Petri Helenius (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Bill Woodcock (Feb 10)
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices Jack Bates (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Charles Youse (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Bill Woodcock (Feb 10)
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices Aditya (Feb 10)
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices Charles Sprickman (Feb 11)
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices John Todd (Feb 11)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Bill Woodcock (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Bill Woodcock (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Bill Woodcock (Feb 10)
- Re: VoIP QOS best practices Steve Feldman (Feb 10)
- RE: VoIP QOS best practices Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 10)