nanog mailing list archives
Re: AS Path Loops in practice ?
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 20:01:05 -0500
In a message written on Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 11:07:03PM +0000, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
Perhaps I'm missing something having not done this myself but why arent the customers just using private ASNs? That would also remove the 'must default' clause.
Not enough, customers already use them internally, other things use them (eg, route servers), easier to talk customers through configs on the phone, allows customers who have IP space but not an ASN to announce to the Internet without the provider having to announce directly. I'll bet there are more I can't remember. -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/ Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request () tmbg org, www.tmbg.org
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- AS Path Loops in practice ? Jaideep Chandrashekar (Dec 08)
- Re: AS Path Loops in practice ? Robert E. Seastrom (Dec 08)
- Re: AS Path Loops in practice ? Joe Provo (Dec 08)
- Re: AS Path Loops in practice ? Robert E. Seastrom (Dec 08)
- Re: AS Path Loops in practice ? Joe Provo (Dec 08)
- Re: AS Path Loops in practice ? Ben Crocker (Dec 09)
- Re: AS Path Loops in practice ? Niels Bakker (Dec 09)
- Re: AS Path Loops in practice ? Leo Bicknell (Dec 09)
- Re: AS Path Loops in practice ? Niels Bakker (Dec 09)
- Re: AS Path Loops in practice ? Stephen J. Wilcox (Dec 11)
- Re: AS Path Loops in practice ? Leo Bicknell (Dec 11)
- Re: AS Path Loops in practice ? Jeff Aitken (Dec 11)
- Re: AS Path Loops in practice ? David Barak (Dec 11)
- Re: AS Path Loops in practice ? Stephen J. Wilcox (Dec 12)
- Re: AS Path Loops in practice ? David Barak (Dec 12)
- Re: AS Path Loops in practice ? Niels Bakker (Dec 09)
- Re: AS Path Loops in practice ? Robert E. Seastrom (Dec 08)