nanog mailing list archives

Re: AS Path Loops in practice ?


From: "Robert E. Seastrom" <rs () seastrom com>
Date: 08 Dec 2003 20:10:30 -0500



Joe Provo <nanog-post () rsuc gweep net> writes:

While this is an explataion of the behavior, it should not be
an endorsement.  Prepending someone else's AS is a bad practive.
Not only does it munge 'pure' research data, but fowls some 
levels of peer evaluation [in the example, and as-701 connected 
entity seeing your path from 1239 would have to determine why 
they weren't getting your paths; or a casual glance would indicate 
you were'nt peer-worthy because you were behind a peer].

Agreed on all counts.  Note that I didn't suggest that it was a good
idea, just pointed out that this has certainly been done in the past
(I seem to recall more than one organization doing this to keep
certain routes out of AS690).

Worse, 
forging AS-paths obfuscates the operational chain of responsibility.  
Of course that is the goal of some of theses actrivities. 
Obviously-bogus AS paths are a strong indicator of suspicious 
activity.

I'm not sure I agree with that assessment.  Strong indicator of a
nasty hack, much much less strong indicator of anything unseemly
afoot.  Or perhaps this was a use of the term "suspicious" to which
I'm heretofore unaccustomed.

Many providers publish specific BGP communities for customers to 
use to handle the redistribution at the provider's edge; some are 
coarse-grained and some provide real control. Many provide something 
but you have to ask for the information. If your provider doesn't 
give you this service/feature, demand it.

Yes, and vote with your feet when your contract is up if they don't
deliver.

In RS's example, a trip to http://www.sprint.net/policy/bgp.html 
would tell you to just tag with community 65000:701
    route-map to-as1239-nothanks-uu permit 10
     set community 65000:701

Attempting action at a distance generally fails at the far-end of 
your service contract; any implementation that *does* work *should*
only spew data the same distance.

Well, yes.  Attempt this trick at home at your own peril, &c &c &c...

                                        ---Rob

PS: I am sure that we both are going to hell for having the
unmitigated gall to post stuff to NANOG that actually has something to
do with running a backbone.


Current thread: