nanog mailing list archives
Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions
From: bdragon () gweep net
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 18:59:52 -0400 (EDT)
Filtering the bogons does help, and everyone should perform anti-spoofing in the appropriate places. It isn't, however, a silver bullet.it's necessary but not sufficient.anti-spoofing is useful, but vastly insufficient, and hence not necessaryanti-spoofing eliminates certain avenues of attack allowing one to focus on remaining avenues, and hence (as Vix stated) is necessary but not sufficient.it turns 1% of the technical problem into a massive social business problem which, even if it was solvable (which it practically isn't), would also be addressed by technical solutions where no spoofing is involved. but it would provide a lot of fun and soapboxes for wannabe net police and vigilantes. randy
What is your solution which addresses the 100%? 99%? 50%? What problems does anti-spoofing create?
Current thread:
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions, (continued)
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Paul Vixie (Aug 05)
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Barney Wolff (Aug 05)
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Jason Robertson (Aug 05)
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Paul Vixie (Aug 05)
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Christopher L. Morrow (Aug 05)
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Rob Thomas (Aug 05)
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Paul Vixie (Aug 05)
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Christopher L. Morrow (Aug 05)
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions David G. Andersen (Aug 05)
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Rob Thomas (Aug 05)
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions bdragon (Aug 04)