nanog mailing list archives
Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <chris () UU NET>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 05:47:11 +0000 (GMT)
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Paul Vixie wrote:
I don't believe I ever said that the edges shouldn't filter... did I?nope. but you said that backbones couldn't/wouldn't/shouldn't, and i showed that "transitivity" => "laundering", which means backbones MUST filter, to within the best capabilities of current technology.
thats fair enough.
Current thread:
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions, (continued)
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Christopher L. Morrow (Aug 05)
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Mike Tancsa (Aug 05)
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Christopher L. Morrow (Aug 05)
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Paul Vixie (Aug 05)
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Barney Wolff (Aug 05)
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Jason Robertson (Aug 05)
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Paul Vixie (Aug 05)
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Christopher L. Morrow (Aug 05)
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Rob Thomas (Aug 05)
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Paul Vixie (Aug 05)
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Christopher L. Morrow (Aug 05)
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions David G. Andersen (Aug 05)
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions Rob Thomas (Aug 05)
- Re: WANTED: ISPs with DDoS defense solutions bdragon (Aug 04)