nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sobigf + BGP
From: bdragon () gweep net
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 19:36:19 -0400 (EDT)
We have seen that many people *posting* do not have the best of intentions; I can assure you that there are lurkers on Nanog (surprise, surprise) who are not nearly as naive and well-intentioned as J. O. would hope. In fact, I know that there are subscribers from various print media, various on-line media, and certainly some stunningly unpleasant characters that I run into on other lists.
And after being /.ed several times, there are undoubtedly end-users, small enterprises, non-network folks from networking companies, and assorted other groups which don't fit the traditional network operator mold. Oh, and sales people...
Current thread:
- Sobigf + BGP J. Oquendo (Aug 23)
- Re: Sobigf + BGP Robert E. Seastrom (Aug 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Sobigf + BGP guy (Aug 23)
- Re: Sobigf + BGP Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 24)
- Re: Sobigf + BGP Etaoin Shrdlu (Aug 24)
- Re: Sobigf + BGP bdragon (Aug 27)
- Re: Sobigf + BGP Pete Kruckenberg (Aug 27)
- Re: Sobigf + BGP Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 24)
- Re: Sobigf + BGP Sounil Yu (Aug 24)
- Re: Sobigf + BGP Adam Maloney (Aug 24)