nanog mailing list archives
RE: Cogent service
From: "Mark Borchers" <mborchers () igillc com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 14:42:24 -0500
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of David Diaz Subject: Re: Cogent service
{portions deleted}
The hop count question is interesting. Is the consensus that it's mostly a customer service issue, where latency isnt affected but customer perception is? Or is it a real latency issue as more routers take a few CPU cycles to make a routing decision. Dave
An occasionally-overlooked result of engineering your network so that any point in your core is one hop away from any other point is that you negate the second-to-last BGP path selection criteria, which will take you down to the router-ID tiebreaker from time to time.
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent service, (continued)
- Re: Cogent service Ralph Doncaster (Sep 19)
- Re: Cogent service David Diaz (Sep 20)
- Re: Cogent service William B. Norton (Sep 20)
- Re: Cogent service David Diaz (Sep 20)
- Re: Cogent service Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 20)
- Re: Cogent service Petri Helenius (Sep 20)
- Re: Cogent service Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 20)
- Re: Cogent service Petri Helenius (Sep 20)
- Re: Cogent service David Diaz (Sep 20)
- Re: Cogent service Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Sep 24)
- Re: Cogent service Ralph Doncaster (Sep 19)
- RE: Cogent service Mark Borchers (Sep 20)
- Re: Cogent service Stephen Stuart (Sep 20)
- Re: Cogent service Vadim Antonov (Sep 20)
- Re: Cogent service Stephen Sprunk (Sep 20)
- Re: Cogent service Petri Helenius (Sep 21)
- software routers (was: Cogent service) Vadim Antonov (Sep 21)
- Re: Cogent service Michael L. Barrow (Sep 19)
- Re: Cogent service Alex Rubenstein (Sep 19)
- Re: Cogent service Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 19)