nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent service
From: "Michael L. Barrow" <michael () mlbarrow com>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 18:35:41 -0700
wouldn't affect anyone but us. They admitted we needed it and couldn't get the affect any other way, but just couldn't do it. "That's not the product
we
offer."
Yeah -- those types of things suck, but from their perspective this kind of policy allows them to keep their service level consistent. One-offs can end up being expensive in the long run. "If I do it for you, everyone will want the same thing!" -- Michael L. Barrow E: michael () mlbarrow com P: 805-566-0885
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent service, (continued)
- Re: Cogent service Petri Helenius (Sep 20)
- Re: Cogent service David Diaz (Sep 20)
- Re: Cogent service Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Sep 24)
- RE: Cogent service Mark Borchers (Sep 20)
- Re: Cogent service Stephen Stuart (Sep 20)
- Re: Cogent service Vadim Antonov (Sep 20)
- Re: Cogent service Stephen Sprunk (Sep 20)
- Re: Cogent service Petri Helenius (Sep 21)
- software routers (was: Cogent service) Vadim Antonov (Sep 21)
- Re: Cogent service Michael L. Barrow (Sep 19)
- Re: Cogent service Alex Rubenstein (Sep 19)
- Re: Cogent service Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 19)
- RE: Cogent service jlewis (Sep 22)
- selective prepends (RE: Cogent service) E.B. Dreger (Sep 22)
- Re: selective prepends (RE: Cogent service) Olivier Bonaventure (Sep 23)
- Re: selective prepends (RE: Cogent service) German Martinez (Sep 23)
- RE: Cogent service David Schwartz (Sep 23)