nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent service
From: David Schwartz <davids () webmaster com>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:25:29 -0700
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002 22:35:48 +0300 (IDT), Arie Vayner wrote:
Does anyone have any comments (good or bad) about Cognet as a transit provider in New York? They seem to be too cheap. Arie
We use them. They work, they're reliable, they keep their promises, and their NOC is incredibly responsive during denial of service attacks or other problems. My only complaint is that if you need anything customized at all, they just won't do it. They script and standardize everything. At one point, we needed one slight configuration change to a machine colocated at our office that wouldn't affect anyone but us. They admitted we needed it and couldn't get the affect any other way, but just couldn't do it. "That's not the product we offer." DS
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent service, (continued)
- Re: Cogent service Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 20)
- Re: Cogent service Petri Helenius (Sep 20)
- Re: Cogent service David Diaz (Sep 20)
- Re: Cogent service Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Sep 24)
- RE: Cogent service Mark Borchers (Sep 20)
- Re: Cogent service Stephen Stuart (Sep 20)
- Re: Cogent service Vadim Antonov (Sep 20)
- Re: Cogent service Stephen Sprunk (Sep 20)
- Re: Cogent service Petri Helenius (Sep 21)
- software routers (was: Cogent service) Vadim Antonov (Sep 21)
- Re: Cogent service Michael L. Barrow (Sep 19)
- Re: Cogent service Alex Rubenstein (Sep 19)
- Re: Cogent service Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 19)
- RE: Cogent service jlewis (Sep 22)
- selective prepends (RE: Cogent service) E.B. Dreger (Sep 22)
- Re: selective prepends (RE: Cogent service) Olivier Bonaventure (Sep 23)
- Re: selective prepends (RE: Cogent service) German Martinez (Sep 23)
- RE: Cogent service David Schwartz (Sep 23)