nanog mailing list archives

RE: Sprint VS. Qwest


From: "Mark Borchers" <mborchers () igillc com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 16:56:13 -0500


OK, given the choice between tier 1 "A" and tier 1 "B",
suppose you can show that interconnect bandwidth between
the two is underprovisioned.  Armed with that knowledge,
which of the two do you choose as your transit provider?


-----Original Message-----

On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 12:18:47PM -0500, dgold wrote:

Both Sprint and Qwest are, most would agree, transit-free, "tier 1"
networks. They interconnect with all other similarly large networks. How
much more do you want? The size of their interconnections to
701? I'm not
sure how that is useful.

http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/sjc/sjc-sprint-oc3.html
http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/iad/iad-sprint-oc3.html
http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/chi/chi-sprint.html
http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/nyc/nyc-sprint.html
http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/lax/lax-sprint.html

'cause yeah, no "tier 1" has ever run congested to another, right?

--
Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net>       http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177  (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA  B2 46 B3 D8 14
36 FE B6)


Current thread: