nanog mailing list archives
RE: Sprint VS. Qwest
From: "Mark Borchers" <mborchers () igillc com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 16:56:13 -0500
OK, given the choice between tier 1 "A" and tier 1 "B", suppose you can show that interconnect bandwidth between the two is underprovisioned. Armed with that knowledge, which of the two do you choose as your transit provider?
-----Original Message----- On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 12:18:47PM -0500, dgold wrote:Both Sprint and Qwest are, most would agree, transit-free, "tier 1" networks. They interconnect with all other similarly large networks. How much more do you want? The size of their interconnections to701? I'm notsure how that is useful.http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/sjc/sjc-sprint-oc3.html http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/iad/iad-sprint-oc3.html http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/chi/chi-sprint.html http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/nyc/nyc-sprint.html http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/lax/lax-sprint.html 'cause yeah, no "tier 1" has ever run congested to another, right? -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)
Current thread:
- Sprint VS. Qwest Christopher K. Neitzert (Oct 16)
- Re: [NANOG-LIST] Sprint VS. Qwest Brent Van Dussen (Oct 16)
- Re: [NANOG-LIST] Sprint VS. Qwest Chris Woodfield (Oct 23)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Mark Kent (Oct 16)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Chris Adams (Oct 16)
- RE: Sprint VS. Qwest Eric M. Carroll (Oct 18)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest jnull (Oct 16)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Stephen J. Wilcox (Oct 17)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest dgold (Oct 18)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 18)
- RE: Sprint VS. Qwest Mark Borchers (Oct 18)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Leo Bicknell (Oct 18)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Niclas Comstedt (Oct 18)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest dgold (Oct 18)
- Re: [NANOG-LIST] Sprint VS. Qwest Brent Van Dussen (Oct 16)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Stephen J. Wilcox (Oct 19)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest dgold (Oct 22)