nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sprint VS. Qwest
From: Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 17:44:06 -0400
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 12:18:47PM -0500, dgold wrote:
Both Sprint and Qwest are, most would agree, transit-free, "tier 1" networks. They interconnect with all other similarly large networks. How much more do you want? The size of their interconnections to 701? I'm not sure how that is useful.
http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/sjc/sjc-sprint-oc3.html http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/iad/iad-sprint-oc3.html http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/chi/chi-sprint.html http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/nyc/nyc-sprint.html http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/lax/lax-sprint.html 'cause yeah, no "tier 1" has ever run congested to another, right? -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)
Current thread:
- Sprint VS. Qwest Christopher K. Neitzert (Oct 16)
- Re: [NANOG-LIST] Sprint VS. Qwest Brent Van Dussen (Oct 16)
- Re: [NANOG-LIST] Sprint VS. Qwest Chris Woodfield (Oct 23)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Mark Kent (Oct 16)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Chris Adams (Oct 16)
- RE: Sprint VS. Qwest Eric M. Carroll (Oct 18)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest jnull (Oct 16)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Stephen J. Wilcox (Oct 17)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest dgold (Oct 18)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 18)
- RE: Sprint VS. Qwest Mark Borchers (Oct 18)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Leo Bicknell (Oct 18)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Niclas Comstedt (Oct 18)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest dgold (Oct 18)
- Re: [NANOG-LIST] Sprint VS. Qwest Brent Van Dussen (Oct 16)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest Stephen J. Wilcox (Oct 19)
- Re: Sprint VS. Qwest dgold (Oct 22)