nanog mailing list archives
Re: Interconnects
From: ren <ren () internet rockstar org>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 08:01:15 -0400
That depends on your corporate needs for power, security, remote hands, etc. The extended services found at Equinix & PAIX are very important for many networks.
-ren At 08:00 AM 5/17/2002 -0400, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
What about NYIIX/6IIX? Being in Telehouse where there are no monthly fees for for cross-connects gives it a financial advantage over Equinix. Ralph Doncaster principal, IStop.com div. of Doncaster Consulting Inc. On Fri, 17 May 2002, ren wrote: > > Hi Iljitsch, > > I would not consider Sprint NAP, a place closed to new customers for> several years, an important interconnect location in the US. ATM based IXs> are not as participant rich as they were 2-3 years ago. > > The fastest growing US interconnect locations are cross-connect > enabled. PAIX & Equinix. Equinix-Ashburn, PAIX-Seattle, Equinix-Newark > and Equinix-Dallas and others have seen participation grow with a diverse > blend of traffic from cable operators, telcos and content providers. > > Tier-1 means what? Look for growing sources of traffic. > > Your mileage may vary, -ren > > At 11:48 AM 5/17/2002 +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > > >A bunch of us are thinking about multihoming solutions for IPv6. For this > >purpose, it is useful to know a bit more about how actual networks (rather > >than the ones existing only as ASCII drawings) interconnect. So: > > > >- What are the 12 - 18 most important interconnect locations in the world? > > MAE East, the Ameritech, Sprint and PacBell NAPs, PAIX, LINX and AMS-IX > > come to mind, but from where I'm sitting it's hard to judge whether > > others are important or marginal. > > > >- To how many of them do typical tier-1 and tier-2 networks connect? > > > >- Using private or public interconnects? > > >
Current thread:
- Re: Interconnects, (continued)
- Re: Interconnects Alex Rubenstein (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Mike Leber (May 18)
- EBITDA [was Re: Interconnects] Steve Gibbard (May 18)
- Re: EBITDA [was Re: Interconnects] Mike Leber (May 18)
- Re: EBITDA [was Re: Interconnects] Paul Vixie (May 18)
- Re: EBITDA [was Re: Interconnects] Chris Woodfield (May 20)
- Re: EBITDA [was Re: Interconnects] Valdis . Kletnieks (May 20)
- Re: EBITDA [was Re: Interconnects] Brian (May 20)
- Re: Interconnects Mitch Halmu (May 18)
- Re: Interconnects Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino (May 17)
- Message not available
- Re: Interconnects ren (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects todd glassey (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Scott Granados (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Mitch Halmu (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Stephen J. Wilcox (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Valdis . Kletnieks (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Stephen J. Wilcox (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Mitch Halmu (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Anthony D Cennami (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects todd glassey (May 17)
- Re: Interconnects Allan Liska (May 17)