nanog mailing list archives
Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () zocalo net>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 13:30:43 -0800 (PST)
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > In general, as companies and backbones merge and eliminate "old" ASNs, that > would reduce the overall AS path length. This isn't something I really care to make a big argument of, but my point was that for many ISPs, the path will go from: SELF - EXODUS to: SELF - OTHER BACKBONE - C&W for a net increase in average path length. That is, of course, a gross generalization. And not anything I'm trying to make a big point of. -Bill
Current thread:
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering, (continued)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Bill Woodcock (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Bill Woodcock (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Allan Liska (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Bill Woodcock (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Chris Woodfield (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Bill Woodcock (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Jesper Skriver (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Hank Nussbacher (Mar 26)
- RE: Exodus/C&W Depeering Deepak Jain (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Bill Woodcock (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Bill Woodcock (Mar 26)
- RE: Exodus/C&W Depeering Sean Donelan (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Chris Woodfield (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Christian Nielsen (Mar 27)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Adam Rothschild (Mar 27)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering E.B. Dreger (Mar 26)