nanog mailing list archives
Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () zocalo net>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 10:18:04 -0800 (PST)
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote: > You mean Exodus are well connected and C&W limit themselves which gives > longer paths and increased latency. Longer paths definitely, increased jitter probably, increased latency probably, increased loss possibly. C&W obviously have to have a lot of peering as well, since it's all they have to sell to their customers. However, their peering tends to be limited to a small number of peers to whom they have large connections, whereas Exodus had a large number of peers to whom they had medium-sized connections. So the average hop-count and as-path length for the Internet as a whole are both increased by this action, and nearly all paths increase in length for Exodus customers. So yes, Exodus customers are the big losers in the wake of this. -Bill
Current thread:
- Exodus/C&W Depeering Chris Parker (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Chris Woodfield (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering German Martinez (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Joseph T. Klein (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Bill Woodcock (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Bill Woodcock (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Allan Liska (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Bill Woodcock (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Chris Woodfield (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Bill Woodcock (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Jesper Skriver (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Hank Nussbacher (Mar 26)
- RE: Exodus/C&W Depeering Deepak Jain (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Bill Woodcock (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering German Martinez (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Chris Woodfield (Mar 26)
- RE: Exodus/C&W Depeering Sean Donelan (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Chris Woodfield (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Christian Nielsen (Mar 27)