nanog mailing list archives
RE: Exodus/C&W Depeering
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 12:47:57 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Chris Flores wrote:
<snip> Should be interesting to see how this impacts the ability to reach sites hosted at Exodus. </snip> nothing complicated. just means you will utilize a transit provider to reach Exodus hosted sites instead of direct public peer. unless you privately peer with C&W. the bottom line - it will now cost you more to reach Exodus hosted sites...
Since Exodus is mostly a webhoster, do they have an asymetric traffic flow. Isn't bulk of the bandwidth is outbound from Exodus. Won't this just increase the distance and AS count for Exodus outbound traffic, making Exodus hosting even less desirable?
Current thread:
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering, (continued)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Allan Liska (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Bill Woodcock (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Chris Woodfield (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Bill Woodcock (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Jesper Skriver (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Hank Nussbacher (Mar 26)
- RE: Exodus/C&W Depeering Deepak Jain (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Bill Woodcock (Mar 26)
- RE: Exodus/C&W Depeering Sean Donelan (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Chris Woodfield (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Christian Nielsen (Mar 27)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Adam Rothschild (Mar 27)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering E.B. Dreger (Mar 26)