nanog mailing list archives

Re: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"


From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 02:57:43 +0000 (GMT)


Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 09:18:31 +0800
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian () creative net au>

Personally, I think that would be wonderful for Residential
Cable/DSL services - there's only going to be a (relatively)
small number of your userbase that will ever be affected by
the bandwidth limiting, and you're still providing "unlimited"
connectivity to whatever you deem as "local" ..

That's something I'd also thought of.  Ratelimiting with
logarithmic aging and a long half-life... it would be more gentle
than a cap that kicks in after, say, 30 seconds.


Eddy

Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence
--

Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist () brics com>
To: blacklist () brics com
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.

These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.  Do NOT
send mail to <blacklist () brics com>, or you are likely to be blocked.


Current thread: