nanog mailing list archives
Re: traffic filtering
From: Stephen Griffin <stephen.griffin () rcn com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 18:46:38 -0500 (EST)
In the referenced message, Stephen Griffin said:
Hello, I'm curious about how many networks completely filter all traffic to any ip address ending in either ".0" or ".255".
Just to clarify, since a lot of the messages I'm receiving seem to indicate I was unclear. I'm not trying to determine how I should filter. I'm trying to determine how many other networks filter in such a manner that traffic to/from legitimate hosts is blocked. One solution, rather than completely filter particular ip addresses, is to simply rate-limit either/both icmp echo request/icmp echo response message types. This should allow these other networks the ability to mitigate smurfs, while still allowing traffic from legitimate ip addresses.
Current thread:
- traffic filtering Stephen Griffin (Jan 21)
- Re: traffic filtering Jared Mauch (Jan 21)
- Re: traffic filtering Jake Khuon (Jan 21)
- Re: traffic filtering Stephen Griffin (Jan 21)
- Re: traffic filtering John Kristoff (Jan 21)
- Re: traffic filtering Stephen Griffin (Jan 21)
- Re: traffic filtering Jim Segrave (Jan 22)
- Re: traffic filtering Avleen Vig (Jan 21)
- Re: traffic filtering Joe Abley (Jan 22)
- Re: traffic filtering E.B. Dreger (Jan 22)
- Re: traffic filtering J.F. Noonan (Jan 22)
- Re: traffic filtering J.F. Noonan (Jan 22)
- Re: traffic filtering Joe Abley (Jan 22)
- Re: traffic filtering Jay Ford (Jan 24)
- Re: traffic filtering Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 24)
- Re: traffic filtering Jared Mauch (Jan 21)