nanog mailing list archives
Re: traffic filtering
From: Stephen Griffin <stephen.griffin () rcn com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 18:43:07 -0500 (EST)
In the referenced message, Jared Mauch said:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 05:53:16PM -0500, Stephen Griffin wrote:Hello, I'm curious about how many networks completely filter all traffic to any ip address ending in either ".0" or ".255".they will have problems reaching people who are now using /31s on links that cover the last /31 and first /31 of the /24 that they reside in. - Jared
or (as in my case) router loopbacks using a /32 with .0 or .255, or dialup users allocated out of a /21 pool, where any but the first .0 and last .255 are legitimate (technically, with dialup if they are allocated as /32's they are all legitimate). Or any lan larger than a /24.
Current thread:
- traffic filtering Stephen Griffin (Jan 21)
- Re: traffic filtering Jared Mauch (Jan 21)
- Re: traffic filtering Jake Khuon (Jan 21)
- Re: traffic filtering Stephen Griffin (Jan 21)
- Re: traffic filtering John Kristoff (Jan 21)
- Re: traffic filtering Stephen Griffin (Jan 21)
- Re: traffic filtering Jim Segrave (Jan 22)
- Re: traffic filtering Avleen Vig (Jan 21)
- Re: traffic filtering Joe Abley (Jan 22)
- Re: traffic filtering E.B. Dreger (Jan 22)
- Re: traffic filtering J.F. Noonan (Jan 22)
- Re: traffic filtering J.F. Noonan (Jan 22)
- Re: traffic filtering Joe Abley (Jan 22)
- Re: traffic filtering Jay Ford (Jan 24)
- Re: traffic filtering Jared Mauch (Jan 21)