nanog mailing list archives
RE: genuity - any good?
From: "Kris Foster" <Kris.Foster () telus com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 09:40:18 -0600
Quick correct, they are extended access-lists
-----Original Message----- From: Kris Foster [mailto:Kris.Foster () telus com] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 11:02 AM To: 'Roy'; matthew zeier; nanog () merit edu Subject: RE: genuity - any good?reasonable route for your prefixes. According to one of their top people, prefix-lists were unreliable new technology. We gave up and canceled the circuit.Genuity does use prefix lists (at least now). And, in my experiences with them is extremely fast in their turn around time to update these. Kris
Current thread:
- Route Filtering (Was: Re: genuity - any good?), (continued)
- Route Filtering (Was: Re: genuity - any good?) Leo Bicknell (Apr 12)
- RE: genuity - any good? David Luyer (Apr 12)
- limiting # of prefixes from a BGP peer (Was: Re: genuity - any good?) Rafi Sadowsky (Apr 13)
- Re: limiting # of prefixes from a BGP peer (Was: Re: genuity - any good?) German Martinez (Apr 13)
- Re: genuity - any good? Stephen Griffin (Apr 15)
- Re: genuity - any good? Eric Whitehill (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Adam Rothschild (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? matthew zeier (Apr 12)
- RE: genuity - any good? Kris Foster (Apr 12)
- RE: genuity - any good? Kris Foster (Apr 12)
- RE: genuity - any good? Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Jesper Skriver (Apr 13)
- RE: genuity - any good? Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 12)
- RE: genuity - any good? Martin, Christian (Apr 12)
- RE: genuity - any good? Daniel Golding (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Roy (Apr 12)
- RE: genuity - any good? David Luyer (Apr 12)