nanog mailing list archives
Re: genuity - any good?
From: Roy <garlic () garlic com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 14:04:42 -0700
You have hit the nail on the head. I don't argue with route filtering, just the hoops that I had to go through with Genuity as compared to my other providers. At the time, the fastest line available in my location was T1 and I was having to load balance between providers and lines by advertising small pieces out different lines. "Martin, Christian" wrote:
I think the argument is not about route filtering - it is the implementation method. Genuity uses ip extended access-lists. Everyone else uses prefix-lists. To a purist, the former is more granular, but performs poorly because it is a linked list implementation. The later, while less granular, performs faster by using a trie. It also allows insertion without list rebuilding. Does this matter much? I'm sure there are some that have tested convergence between the two technologies, so I'd welcome comments out of curiosity. They are somewhat anal with their lists as well. If you have a /19, but you want to deaggregate for inbound BGP TE, you will need to send them EVERY route you will send. That can be 64 subnets. For a /16, it is waaayyy worse. Then again, it allows them to know exactly how many prefixes MAY be announced from their customers, which I suppose has its merits. chris-----Original Message----- From: neil () DOMINO ORG [mailto:neil () DOMINO ORG] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:08 PM To: garlic () garlic com Cc: matthew () velvet org; nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: genuity - any good?1) Their BGP polices are not as good as others. They force you to register each route you want to advertise rather thanallowing you toadvertise any reasonable route for your prefixes. Accordingto one oftheir top people, prefix-lists were unreliable new technology. We gave up and canceled the circuit.Man I don't know of a provider that doesn't do this - but the fact is this is a good thing.
Current thread:
- Re: genuity - any good?, (continued)
- Re: genuity - any good? Eric Whitehill (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Adam Rothschild (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? matthew zeier (Apr 12)
- RE: genuity - any good? Kris Foster (Apr 12)
- RE: genuity - any good? Kris Foster (Apr 12)
- RE: genuity - any good? Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Jesper Skriver (Apr 13)
- RE: genuity - any good? Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 12)
- RE: genuity - any good? Martin, Christian (Apr 12)
- RE: genuity - any good? Daniel Golding (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Roy (Apr 12)
- RE: genuity - any good? David Luyer (Apr 12)