nanog mailing list archives
Re: limiting # of prefixes from a BGP peer (Was: Re: genuity - any good?)
From: German Martinez <gmartine () mafalda opentransit net>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 12:34:07 -0400 (EDT)
For Cisco IOS just add this under the "router bgp" section
Here is the way that you use to do the same in JunOS. http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos51/swconfig51-routing/html/bgp-summary33.html They introduced a cool feature (idle-timeout). "If you include the idle-timeout statement, the session is torn down for a specified amount of time, or forever. If you specify a period of time, the session is allowed to reestablish after this timeout period. If you specify forever, the session will be reestablished only after you intervene with a clear bgp neighbor command" German
Current thread:
- Re: genuity - any good?, (continued)
- Re: genuity - any good? Stephen Griffin (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Roy (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Aditya (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Sean Donelan (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? David Schwartz (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 13)
- Re: genuity - any good? Mark Kent (Apr 12)
- Route Filtering (Was: Re: genuity - any good?) Leo Bicknell (Apr 12)
- RE: genuity - any good? David Luyer (Apr 12)
- limiting # of prefixes from a BGP peer (Was: Re: genuity - any good?) Rafi Sadowsky (Apr 13)
- Re: limiting # of prefixes from a BGP peer (Was: Re: genuity - any good?) German Martinez (Apr 13)
- Re: genuity - any good? Stephen Griffin (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Stephen Griffin (Apr 15)
- Re: genuity - any good? matthew zeier (Apr 12)
- RE: genuity - any good? Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Jesper Skriver (Apr 13)