![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset)
From: "Joseph T. Klein" <jtk () titania net>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 23:43:17 +0000
Some cites have peering and co-locations diversity, some don't. InfoMart & Westin Building come to mind. Those should rank high by your list. At 13:19 -0400 25-09-2001, Sean Donelan wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001 bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:> > When 25 Broadway failed, approximately 1% of the global Internet > > routing table also disappeared. Which I would guess qualifies it From what point did 1% of the routing table disappear? Was the same visable from multiple, diverse points? I expect that from some perspectives, 100% of the routing table disappeared and some places didn't even see a blip.The Internet as we know it is just a collective illusion. You are correct from one side of the partion, 99% of the routes disappeared and on the other side 1% of the routes disappeared. I checked four different BGP feeds from a mix of providers, and they were fairly consistent. But percentage of routes is just one way to measure "importance." It may not be the best way. Other methods include 1. Number of stock options owned by Very Important People 2. CAIDA skitter traces of routers of confluence 3. Number of OC-192 links in a building 4. Number of "Tier 1" providers in a building 5. Government fiat 6. Wait for the building to fall down and see what happens Assuming there are locations more impotant than others, should we do anything? Or should we just hope no one else figures out where they are?
-- Joseph T. Klein +1 414 915 7489 Senior Network Engineer jtk () titania net Adelphia Business Solutions joseph.klein () adelphiacom com "... the true value of the Internet is its connectedness ..." -- John W. Stewart III
Current thread:
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset), (continued)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Bob Bownes (Sep 24)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Sean Donelan (Sep 24)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Grant A. Kirkwood (Sep 24)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Chris Woodfield (Sep 24)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) bmanning (Sep 24)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Sean Donelan (Sep 25)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) batz (Sep 25)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Peter van Dijk (Sep 25)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Randy Bush (Sep 25)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Alex Bligh (Sep 25)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Joseph T. Klein (Sep 25)
- RE: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Matt Levine (Sep 24)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) mike harrison (Sep 24)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) E.B. Dreger (Sep 24)
- RE: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Timothy R. McKee (Sep 24)
- RE: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Vivien M. (Sep 24)
- RE: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Joel Jaeggli (Sep 24)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Adam Rothschild (Sep 24)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) ray (Sep 25)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Sean Donelan (Sep 24)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) bmanning (Sep 25)