nanog mailing list archives
Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset)
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 20:00:04 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, mike harrison wrote:
Ona physical layer, there are WAY too many points where lots of fiber from multiple providers crosses the same bridge.... uses the same railroad right of way... too many to think about and stay sane,
Under the new Anti-Terrorism Act, damaging communication lines, stations or systems would become a Federal Terrorism Offense. I feel sorry for the backhoe operators.
Current thread:
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset), (continued)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Alex Bligh (Sep 25)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Joseph T. Klein (Sep 25)
- RE: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Matt Levine (Sep 24)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) mike harrison (Sep 24)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) E.B. Dreger (Sep 24)
- RE: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Timothy R. McKee (Sep 24)
- RE: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Vivien M. (Sep 24)
- RE: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Joel Jaeggli (Sep 24)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Adam Rothschild (Sep 24)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) ray (Sep 25)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) Sean Donelan (Sep 24)
- Re: Points of Failure (was Re: National infrastructure asset) bmanning (Sep 25)
- Re: National infrastructure asset Jim Popovitch (Sep 23)