RE: C&W Peering

[James Thomason <james () divide org>]

No, this is the part where I laugh at all of the people who told me this
how wonderfully effecient Inter-provider settlement and 95th percentile
billing are in the Internet today. 

Regards, 
James

On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Vivien M. wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Christopher A. Woodfield [mailto:rekoil () semihuman com]
> > Sent: June 4, 2001 7:55 PM
> > To: John Starta
> > Cc: Vivien M.; Mike Hughes; Sean Donelan; nanog () merit edu
> > Subject: Re: C&W Peering
> >
> > I don't think that this is going to be solved by C&W reversing
> > themselves;
> > I think PSI is going to have to get itself some transit, and quickly.
>
> Is this the part where the people (eg: Exodus, AboveNet are the two I can
> think of immediately) who were forced to get themselves some transit because
> PSI wouldn't peer with them anymore go and laugh at the irony of C&W pulling
> a PSI on PSI themselves?
>
> Vivien
> --
> Vivien M.
> vivienm () dyndns org
> Assistant System Administrator
> Dynamic DNS Network Services
> http://www.dyndns.org/