nanog mailing list archives
RE: C&W Peering
From: "Scott Patterson" <scottp () netrail net>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 18:41:46 -0400
Did C&W consider the route table effects of this new routing policy?
You must first know what a route table is before you can measure such a thing. The only thing they saw were the dollar signs they "thought" they would bring in. Exactly what happens when finance runs your peering department and the engineers don't have anything to say about it. -Scott
Current thread:
- Re: C&W Peering, (continued)
- Re: C&W Peering Jared Mauch (Jun 04)
- Message not available
- Re: C&W Peering Eric Gauthier (Jun 04)
- RE: C&W Peering Vivien M. (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Leo Bicknell (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Richard Welty (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Vincent J. Bono (Jun 05)
- Re: C&W Peering Rafi Sadowsky (Jun 06)
- RE: C&W Peering Scott Patterson (Jun 04)
- RE: C&W Peering Matt Levine (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering (and nTH Percentile Unite!) James Thomason (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W peering Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 09)