nanog mailing list archives
Re: C&W Peering
From: Richard Welty <rwelty () averillpark net>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 21:03:15 -0400
At 08:51 PM 6/4/2001 -0400, Leo Bicknell wrote:
I know almost nothing about bankruptcy, so I would love for someone who does to comment. Put simply, if a company can't pay its creditors and suppliers do they have any chance of entering into a new purchase agreement? I know that I personally wouldn't offer them Net-30 payment terms right now.
actually, this is an interesting point. normally in bankruptcy, vendors for the bankrupt outfit are not permitted to terminate services. now a true peering agreement isn't a vendor/customer relationship, but it is interesting to consider how a bankruptcy court might see it. C&W has done some level of damage (how much is uncertain) to a company in bankruptcy, and there was probably some written agreement with the force of a contract between the two. i bet this ends up in court more or less immediately. richard -- Richard Welty rwelty () averillpark net Averill Park Networking -- Network Engineering, Software Development http://www.averillpark.net/ 518-573-7592
Current thread:
- Re: C&W Peering, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: C&W Peering ken harris. (Jun 05)
- Re: C&W Peering Jared Mauch (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Mike Hughes (Jun 04)
- RE: C&W Peering Vivien M. (Jun 04)
- RE: C&W Peering John Starta (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Jared Mauch (Jun 04)
- Message not available
- Re: C&W Peering Eric Gauthier (Jun 04)
- RE: C&W Peering Vivien M. (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Leo Bicknell (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Richard Welty (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Vincent J. Bono (Jun 05)
- Re: C&W Peering Rafi Sadowsky (Jun 06)
- RE: C&W Peering Scott Patterson (Jun 04)
- RE: C&W Peering Matt Levine (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering Christopher A. Woodfield (Jun 04)
- Re: C&W Peering (and nTH Percentile Unite!) James Thomason (Jun 04)