nanog mailing list archives
Re: rfc 1918?
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon () eiv com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 14:40:52 -0500
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 02:28:07AM -0500, Andrew Brown wrote:
indeed. i fought with uunet a couple of years ago about this. after about a dozen phone calls, countless emails (including a few megabytes of packet dumps), and who knows how many people, i finally reached someone at uunet who was willing to say "no, we don't filter that stuff and no, we aren't going to".
I'm tempted to buy one share of stock, then show up a shareholders' meeting and complain about the (probable) fact that they spend more money arguing with people about this than it would cost them to start filtering it at the borders.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- duh (Re: [NANOG] Re: RE: rfc 1918?), (continued)
- duh (Re: [NANOG] Re: RE: rfc 1918?) Pim van Riezen (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 24)
- RE: rfc 1918? Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Ariel Biener (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Shawn McMahon (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Andrew Brown (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Shawn McMahon (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Andrew Brown (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Richard A. Steenbergen (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Eric A. Hall (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Adrian Chadd (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Ariel Biener (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Eric A. Hall (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? SMcGrath (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Rancken (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? SMcGrath (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? bill manning (Feb 24)
- RE: rfc 1918? Mark Borchers (Feb 24)