nanog mailing list archives
Re: rfc 1918?
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian () creative net au>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 18:13:40 +0800
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001, Eric A. Hall wrote:
RFC1918 addreses cause real problems. They are not supposed to be used. It cannot be made much clearer than that. Choosing to ignore the wishes of the rest of the Internet community in order to make your own life a little bit easier is not a question of free will, it is a matter of selfishishness. Furthermore, if you claim that you have the right to violate spirit and intent of Internet BCPs then I certainly have the right to complain about it without being labelled as psycho/paranoid/nazi.
Neat. Well, how about we apply your zeal and get packet source address spoofing sorted out so we at least have a way of tracing broken machines being used as DoS hosts? Pretty please? :) Adrian -- Adrian Chadd "Romance novel?" <adrian () creative net au> "Girl Porn." - http://www.sinfest.net/d/20010202.html
Current thread:
- Re: rfc 1918?, (continued)
- Re: rfc 1918? Ariel Biener (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Shawn McMahon (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Andrew Brown (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Shawn McMahon (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Andrew Brown (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Richard A. Steenbergen (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Eric A. Hall (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Adrian Chadd (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Ariel Biener (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Eric A. Hall (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? SMcGrath (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Rancken (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? SMcGrath (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? bill manning (Feb 24)
- RE: rfc 1918? Mark Borchers (Feb 24)
- RE: rfc 1918? Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Scott Francis (Feb 24)
- RE: rfc 1918? Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- RE: rfc 1918? Chris Davis (Feb 24)