nanog mailing list archives
Re: rfc 1918?
From: Andrew Brown <twofsonet () graffiti com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 02:28:07 -0500
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 06:05:12PM -0500, Shawn McMahon wrote:
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 03:38:56PM -0500, Chris Davis wrote:Does anyone know why I get inbound packets from 10.x.x.x coming from my ISP, UUNet?Because they aren't filtering properly. You can solve it by filtering yourself.
indeed. i fought with uunet a couple of years ago about this. after about a dozen phone calls, countless emails (including a few megabytes of packet dumps), and who knows how many people, i finally reached someone at uunet who was willing to say "no, we don't filter that stuff and no, we aren't going to". *sigh* -- |-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----| codewarrior () daemon org * "ah! i see you have the internet twofsonet () graffiti com (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!" andrew () crossbar com * "information is power -- share the wealth."
Current thread:
- Re: [NANOG] RE: rfc 1918?, (continued)
- Re: [NANOG] RE: rfc 1918? Pim van Riezen (Feb 24)
- RE: [NANOG] RE: rfc 1918? Mark Radabaugh (Feb 24)
- duh (Re: [NANOG] Re: RE: rfc 1918?) Pim van Riezen (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 24)
- RE: rfc 1918? Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Ariel Biener (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Andrew Brown (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Shawn McMahon (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Eric A. Hall (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Adrian Chadd (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Greg A. Woods (Feb 24)
- Re: rfc 1918? Ariel Biener (Feb 24)