nanog mailing list archives
Re: netscan.org update
From: dies <dies () pulltheplug com>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 17:09:16 -0500 (EST)
For whatever reason Cisco's will TAKE null routes to classful broadcasts, however, they will not propagate them. You'll need a Juniper/GateD Box/whatever to push out the routes... And you would only want to null/discard the /32 of the actual ampilifier, not the entire netblocks I would imagine. If you null/discarded the entire /24...well that would make some quite unhappy customers...The object should be not to stop the smurf once it is ongoing, but to prevent it from ever happening... On another note, Troy if you need help with anything...Let me know I'd like to get as many amp sites off the net as possible.. On Sun, 24 Sep 2000, James A. T. Rice wrote:
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000, Troy Davis wrote:links. At last count, there are 66317 smurf-amplifying /24s; of course, they'd be aggregated where possible in the announcements.Why aggregrate ? You could just announce the /32's of the actual broadcast addresses, and cause much less damage to other resources on that network. Also if you do aggregrate, your blackhole route will probabally be less specific then the 'real' route, so the 'real' route and not the blackhole one is what would get used. -James
Current thread:
- Re: netscan.org update, (continued)
- Re: netscan.org update Greg A. Woods (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update Bill Fumerola (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update Patrick Greenwell (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update Troy Davis (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update James A. T. Rice (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update Troy Davis (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update James A. T. Rice (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update Bill Woodcock (Sep 24)
- Message not available
- Re: netscan.org update John Payne (Sep 25)
- Re: netscan.org update Troy Davis (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update dies (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update Jason Slagle (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update Troy Davis (Sep 23)
- Re: netscan.org update John Payne (Sep 25)
- Re: netscan.org update John Fraizer (Sep 25)
- Re: netscan.org update Henry R. Linneweh (Sep 26)
- Re: netscan.org update Daniel Senie (Sep 26)
- Re: netscan.org update Henry R. Linneweh (Sep 26)