nanog mailing list archives
Re: netscan.org update
From: "James A. T. Rice" <James_R-nanog () jump org uk>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 20:21:45 +0100 (BST)
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000, Troy Davis wrote:
links. At last count, there are 66317 smurf-amplifying /24s; of course, they'd be aggregated where possible in the announcements.
Why aggregrate ? You could just announce the /32's of the actual broadcast addresses, and cause much less damage to other resources on that network. Also if you do aggregrate, your blackhole route will probabally be less specific then the 'real' route, so the 'real' route and not the blackhole one is what would get used. -James
Current thread:
- netscan.org update Troy Davis (Sep 23)
- Re: netscan.org update Patrick Greenwell (Sep 23)
- Re: netscan.org update John Fraizer (Sep 23)
- Re: netscan.org update Greg A. Woods (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update Bill Fumerola (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update Patrick Greenwell (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update Troy Davis (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update James A. T. Rice (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update Troy Davis (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update James A. T. Rice (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update Bill Woodcock (Sep 24)
- Message not available
- Re: netscan.org update John Payne (Sep 25)
- Re: netscan.org update John Fraizer (Sep 23)
- Re: netscan.org update Troy Davis (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update Patrick Greenwell (Sep 23)
- Re: netscan.org update dies (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update Jason Slagle (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update Troy Davis (Sep 23)
- Re: netscan.org update John Payne (Sep 25)