nanog mailing list archives

Re: netscan.org update


From: "James A. T. Rice" <James_R-nanog () jump org uk>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 20:21:45 +0100 (BST)


On Sun, 24 Sep 2000, Troy Davis wrote:

links.  At last count, there are 66317 smurf-amplifying /24s; of course, 
they'd be aggregated where possible in the announcements.

Why aggregrate ? You could just announce the /32's of the actual broadcast
addresses, and cause much less damage to other resources on that network.

Also if you do aggregrate, your blackhole route will probabally be less
specific then the 'real' route, so the 'real' route and not the blackhole
one is what would get used.

-James




Current thread: