nanog mailing list archives
Re: netscan.org update
From: "Henry R. Linneweh" <linneweh () concentric net>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 07:40:08 -0700
John; IMHO they are in complicity with harming the network fabric and that of their competitors by allowing such disruption of routing. "The SMURF problem is years old. People who don't look for this on their own networks and prevent it before it starts are AS MUCH if not MORE a part of the problem as the script kiddies". -- Thank you; |--------------------------------| | Thinking is a learned process. | | ICANN member @large | | Gigabit over IP, ieee 802.17 | |--------------------------------| Henry R. Linneweh
Current thread:
- Re: netscan.org update, (continued)
- Re: netscan.org update James A. T. Rice (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update Bill Woodcock (Sep 24)
- Message not available
- Re: netscan.org update John Payne (Sep 25)
- Re: netscan.org update Troy Davis (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update dies (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update Jason Slagle (Sep 24)
- Re: netscan.org update Troy Davis (Sep 23)
- Re: netscan.org update John Payne (Sep 25)
- Re: netscan.org update John Fraizer (Sep 25)
- Re: netscan.org update Henry R. Linneweh (Sep 26)
- Re: netscan.org update Daniel Senie (Sep 26)
- Re: netscan.org update Henry R. Linneweh (Sep 26)
- Re: netscan.org update Michael Shields (Sep 25)