nanog mailing list archives
Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report
From: Andrew Brown <twofsonet () graffiti com>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 00:57:08 -0400
Take a look at: http://www.fox-den.com/routes/Had to look at it real hard until I realized your graphs are growing to the right vs the standard MRTG output.
mrtg makes more sense to me that way also. after all, being of...uh..."english" extraction, i read just about everything else from left to right, so expecting time to rise to the right doesn't seem that far off the mark. -- |-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----| codewarrior () daemon org * "ah! i see you have the internet twofsonet () graffiti com (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!" andrew () crossbar com * "information is power -- share the wealth."
Current thread:
- RE: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Roeland M.J. Meyer (Sep 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report John Todd (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report John Fraizer (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Andrew Brown (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Thomas Marshall Eubanks (Sep 23)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report John Fraizer (Sep 22)
- RE: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Sean Donelan (Sep 22)
- RE: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Sean Donelan (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report nicholas harteau (Sep 22)
- RE: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report jlewis (Sep 22)