nanog mailing list archives
RE: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report
From: jlewis () lewis org
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 00:25:43 -0400 (EDT)
On 22 Sep 2000, Sean Donelan wrote:
Cable&Wireless for one. I worked with several customers who never used the /24's allocated by C&W, but even after repeatedly telling C&W we don't need them, C&W wouldn't take them back. Every circuit came with a /24 whether you needed it or not.
Was that recently or some time ago? I have a client with pending orders for a few C&W DS1's and they're giving him /27's at each site. Each site will have a T1/ethernet router doing NAT and VPN, so in theory, all that's needed is the serial interface IP, but they really wanted to give him a /27 per site, and we figure it's worth taking just in case we eventually want to give something a public IP at one of these sites. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis *jlewis () lewis org*| I route System Administrator | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
Current thread:
- RE: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Roeland M.J. Meyer (Sep 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report John Todd (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report John Fraizer (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Andrew Brown (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Thomas Marshall Eubanks (Sep 23)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report John Fraizer (Sep 22)
- RE: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Sean Donelan (Sep 22)
- RE: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Sean Donelan (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report nicholas harteau (Sep 22)
- RE: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report jlewis (Sep 22)