nanog mailing list archives

Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report


From: nicholas harteau <nrh () ikami com>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 23:02:27 -0500



Conversely, I'm having a problem where I had some /24s associated with
some T1s from C&W via various ISPs that my company acquired, and when
those T1s were rolled into a DS3, C&W insisted on taking the /24s back
and is currently threatening to stop routing them.

Can't win.

Sean Donelan wrote:

On Fri, 22 September 2000, John Fraizer wrote:
Who's forcing address space on customers?  It's like pulling teeth to get
address space from most of them!

Cable&Wireless for one.  I worked with several customers who never used
the /24's allocated by C&W, but even after repeatedly telling C&W we don't
need them, C&W wouldn't take them back.  Every circuit came with a /24
whether you needed it or not.



-- 
nicholas harteau
nrh () ikami com




Current thread: