nanog mailing list archives
Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report
From: nicholas harteau <nrh () ikami com>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 23:02:27 -0500
Conversely, I'm having a problem where I had some /24s associated with some T1s from C&W via various ISPs that my company acquired, and when those T1s were rolled into a DS3, C&W insisted on taking the /24s back and is currently threatening to stop routing them. Can't win. Sean Donelan wrote:
On Fri, 22 September 2000, John Fraizer wrote:Who's forcing address space on customers? It's like pulling teeth to get address space from most of them!Cable&Wireless for one. I worked with several customers who never used the /24's allocated by C&W, but even after repeatedly telling C&W we don't need them, C&W wouldn't take them back. Every circuit came with a /24 whether you needed it or not.
-- nicholas harteau nrh () ikami com
Current thread:
- RE: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Roeland M.J. Meyer (Sep 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report John Todd (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report John Fraizer (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Andrew Brown (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Thomas Marshall Eubanks (Sep 23)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report John Fraizer (Sep 22)
- RE: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Sean Donelan (Sep 22)
- RE: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report Sean Donelan (Sep 22)
- Re: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report nicholas harteau (Sep 22)
- RE: exponential route prefix growth, was: Re: The Cidr Report jlewis (Sep 22)