nanog mailing list archives
Re: more-specifics in class B space?
From: Jeremy Porter <jerry () fc net>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 12:37:02 -0600
doh, wasn't paying attention to what I was doing. This is in fact correct. In message <200003250319.WAA07634 () ra lexis-nexis com>, Larry Snyder writes:
Isn't that 63.0.0.0-63.7.255.255? Where's the overlap? -ls- Deepak Jain <deepak () ai net> wrote:whois -h rr.level3.net 63.0.0.0 % RIPEdb(3.0.0a13) with ISI RPSL extensions route: 63.0.0.0/13 descr: UUNET, An MCI Worldcom Company 3060 Williams Drive Fairfax VA 22031 USA origin: AS701 mnt-by: MAINT-AS701 changed: juzer () UU NET 19981110 source: RADBIs there something inherently wrong about this that I am not seeing? Its not like UUNET is in there as 63.0.0.0/8. Or maybe its late in the week for me to make any sense of routing registry entries. Thanks, Deepak Jain AiNET
--- jerry () fc net Director Network Operations/Network Engineering, Wayport, Inc. 512-519-6193 www.wayport.net 8303 Mopac Expressway Suite A300, Austin Tx.
Current thread:
- Re: more-specifics in class B space?, (continued)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Randy Bush (Mar 22)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Jim Mercer (Mar 22)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Randy Bush (Mar 22)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Randy Bush (Mar 22)
- Message not available
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Jim Mercer (Mar 22)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Joe Provo - Network Architect (Mar 22)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Brian Wallingford (Mar 22)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Marc Slemko (Mar 24)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Jeremy Porter (Mar 24)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Deepak Jain (Mar 24)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Larry Snyder (Mar 24)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Jeremy Porter (Mar 25)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Patrick Greenwell (Mar 24)