nanog mailing list archives
Re: more-specifics in class B space?
From: Joe Provo - Network Architect <joe.provo () rcn com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 22:12:26 -0500
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 07:06:33PM -0500, Jim Mercer wrote:
it appears there are providers out there that are abiding by the "ARIN guidelines" and thereby nuking routes within classical class b space.
[snip] It also appears that there are parties who received address delegations within classical B space and are parceling chunks out, without any delegation or registration. Without that administrativia, and no clear customer-vendor relationship in an AS path, how does this behavior look any different to address hijacking? Cheers, Joe -- Joe Provo Voice 508.486.7471 Director, Internet Planning & Design Fax 508.229.2375 Network Deployment & Management, RCN <joe.provo () rcn com>
Current thread:
- more-specifics in class B space? Tom Spindler (Mar 22)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Jim Mercer (Mar 22)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Randy Bush (Mar 22)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Jim Mercer (Mar 22)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Randy Bush (Mar 22)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Randy Bush (Mar 22)
- Message not available
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Jim Mercer (Mar 22)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Jim Mercer (Mar 22)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Joe Provo - Network Architect (Mar 22)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Brian Wallingford (Mar 22)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Marc Slemko (Mar 24)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Jeremy Porter (Mar 24)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Deepak Jain (Mar 24)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Larry Snyder (Mar 24)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Jeremy Porter (Mar 25)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Patrick Greenwell (Mar 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Sean Donelan (Mar 23)