nanog mailing list archives
Re: more-specifics in class B space?
From: Patrick Greenwell <patrick () cybernothing org>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 20:13:19 -0800 (PST)
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Marc Slemko wrote:
Why are they doing this? Who knows, they don't respond to email.
Boy wouldn't it be nice if there were agreements in place between everyone to offer timely inter-provider addressment of events such as this rather than being forced to engage in public shamings on Nanog on the off chance that someone from a given provider is reading their mail? Oh well, guess the various governments will have to do it for us.... /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ Patrick Greenwell Earth is a single point of failure. \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Current thread:
- Re: more-specifics in class B space?, (continued)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Jim Mercer (Mar 22)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Randy Bush (Mar 22)
- Message not available
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Jim Mercer (Mar 22)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Joe Provo - Network Architect (Mar 22)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Brian Wallingford (Mar 22)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Marc Slemko (Mar 24)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Jeremy Porter (Mar 24)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Deepak Jain (Mar 24)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Larry Snyder (Mar 24)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Jeremy Porter (Mar 25)
- Re: more-specifics in class B space? Patrick Greenwell (Mar 24)