Re: Where are ATM NAPs going?

[Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org>]

On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 08:49:31AM -0500, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
> He said 'density'.
>
> 16 ports (is that right?) of OC48 in a single rack is the opposite of
> 'density'.

        I think some router vendors should also read that statement 
very closely.  Then s/OC48/OC192/ and read it again.

        192 ports of GigE in a half rack is getting close to density.
256 ports of OC-192 in a rack would be great density.

        (Yes, I am a dreamer.)

-- 
Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org
Systems Engineer - Internetworking Engineer - CCIE 3440
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request () tmbg org, www.tmbg.org