nanog mailing list archives
Re: Formal study: How many points networks share
From: ken lindahl <lindahl () ack Berkeley EDU>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 18:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
On 28 Aug 2000 17:32:16, Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com> wrote:
On Sat, 26 August 2000, Randy Bush wrote:but i imagine that we would all be willing to reveal under nda to a trusted research group such as acri, if their result would be well anonymized...
...
ACRI wasn't one of the names normally associated with inside the beltway research projects. SAIC or Mitre are more likely candidates. Before they bought a $700 toilet seat, I was hoping someone had already done it. But it looks like its an open research project.
randy can correct me if i'm wrong, but i think he is referring to ACIRI, not "ACRI." http://www.aciri.org/ ken
Current thread:
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share, (continued)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Randy Bush (Aug 26)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Jonathon Plonka (Aug 26)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Scott Marcus (Aug 27)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Randy Bush (Aug 27)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share batz (Aug 28)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Sean Donelan (Aug 28)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Sean Donelan (Aug 28)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Randy Bush (Aug 28)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share J. Scott Marcus (Aug 28)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share John Fraizer (Aug 28)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share ken lindahl (Aug 28)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Randy Bush (Aug 28)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Randy Bush (Aug 26)