nanog mailing list archives
Re: Formal study: How many points networks share
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: 28 Aug 2000 17:32:16 -0700
On Sat, 26 August 2000, Randy Bush wrote:
but i imagine that we would all be willing to reveal under nda to a trusted research group such as acri, if their result would be well anonymized. but many of us would all have to send letters to each other giving notice etc. messy, but may be worth it for quality research.
After the wave of mergers, attempted mergers, unmergers, and all the related investigations by the EU and DOJ; I think most of the providers know how to give each other notice by now :-) ACRI wasn't one of the names normally associated with inside the beltway research projects. SAIC or Mitre are more likely candidates. Before they bought a $700 toilet seat, I was hoping someone had already done it. But it looks like its an open research project.
Current thread:
- Formal study: How many points networks share Sean Donelan (Aug 26)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Randy Bush (Aug 26)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Jonathon Plonka (Aug 26)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Scott Marcus (Aug 27)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Randy Bush (Aug 27)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share batz (Aug 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Sean Donelan (Aug 28)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Sean Donelan (Aug 28)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Randy Bush (Aug 28)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share J. Scott Marcus (Aug 28)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share John Fraizer (Aug 28)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share ken lindahl (Aug 28)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Randy Bush (Aug 28)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Randy Bush (Aug 26)