nanog mailing list archives
Re: Formal study: How many points networks share
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 17:43:38 -0700
After the wave of mergers, attempted mergers, unmergers, and all the related investigations by the EU and DOJ; I think most of the providers know how to give each other notice by now :-)
really? we hadn't noticed.
ACRI wasn't one of the names normally associated with inside the beltway research projects.
this is good. they seem to do some of the best research out there.
SAIC or Mitre are more likely candidates.
this would be dissapointing. if we have to get beltway bandits, how about ones which have a better rep in internet circles, e.g. bbn, sri, isi, ... randy
Current thread:
- Formal study: How many points networks share Sean Donelan (Aug 26)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Randy Bush (Aug 26)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Jonathon Plonka (Aug 26)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Scott Marcus (Aug 27)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Randy Bush (Aug 27)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share batz (Aug 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Sean Donelan (Aug 28)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Sean Donelan (Aug 28)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Randy Bush (Aug 28)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share J. Scott Marcus (Aug 28)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share John Fraizer (Aug 28)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share ken lindahl (Aug 28)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Randy Bush (Aug 28)
- Re: Formal study: How many points networks share Randy Bush (Aug 26)