nanog mailing list archives
Re: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses)
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 20:39:45 -0800 (PST)
Or just punt, and use iBGP....Can't quite do that - you need an IGP to carry the backbone links & the loopbacks - i.e.: just enough so that the iBGP mesh will come up. --asp
iBGP & statics work pretty good... if your topology is not too complex. --bill
Current thread:
- Re: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses), (continued)
- Re: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses) Jessica Yu (Jan 06)
- IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses) Dan Rabb (Jan 05)
- Re: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses) Henk Smit (Jan 05)
- Re: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses) Tony Li (Jan 05)
- Re: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses) Alex P. Rudnev (Jan 06)
- Re: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses) Randy Bush (Jan 05)
- Re: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses) Antoni Przygienda (Jan 08)
- Re: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses) Scott Brim (Jan 08)
- Re: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses) Henk Smit (Jan 05)
- Re: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses) Andrew Partan (Jan 05)
- Re: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses) bmanning (Jan 05)
- Re: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses) Tony Li (Jan 06)
- Re: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses) Paul G. Donner (Jan 06)
- Re: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses) Niels Chr. Bank-Pedersen (Jan 06)
- RE: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses) Alex P. Rudnev (Jan 06)