nanog mailing list archives
Re: address spoofing
From: Dan Hollis <goemon () sasami anime net>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 18:20:37 -0700 (PDT)
On Fri, 23 Apr 1999, Randy Bush wrote:
huh? for packet filtering, which is what we've been discussing, my experience is quite the opposite. one can't really afford packet filters on routers with oc12s. and in a multi-path universe, filtering for source address spoofing is best done at the edges anyway.
Wonder if its too much to ask the backbones to do sanity checks on their customers T1 lines etc. Eg they arent smurf amplifiers, they have spoof filters, yadda yadda. If this happened perhaps the rate of DoS attacks would go down -Dan
Current thread:
- Re: address spoofing, (continued)
- Re: address spoofing Daniel Senie (Apr 22)
- Re: address spoofing Forrest W. Christian (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Andrew Brown (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Forrest W. Christian (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing sthaug (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing John Leong (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Daniel Senie (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing bmanning (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Daniel Senie (Apr 22)
- Re: address spoofing Andrew Brown (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Randy Bush (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Dan Hollis (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing sthaug (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Greg A. Woods (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Phil Howard (Apr 22)
- Re: address spoofing Greg A. Woods (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Phillip Vandry (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Greg A. Woods (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Phil Howard (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Bryan Bradsby (Apr 23)
- Re: address spoofing Phil Howard (Apr 23)